Feedback

Thank you for participating in the 68th International Conference for Students of Physics and Natural Sciences ‘Open Readings 2025’. We would be grateful if you could share your conference experience by filling in the anonymous form below. Your observations will help us improve next year!

1. How did you participate in 'Open Readings 2025'?

As a presenter of an oral presentation As a presenter of a poster presentation As a moderator As a listener

2. How did you find out about 'Open Readings 2025'?

Other:

3. How much did you participate in the conference this year?

I only attended the session where I was presenting I attended a few sessions and listened to some of the invited speakers I was present every day of the conference

4. How was your overall experience in 'Open Readings 2025'?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10)

5. How was the schedule of the conference?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10)

Comments about the schedule of the conference:

6. Which of the invited speaker lectures did you attend?

7. Of the ones that you have attended, which invited speaker lectures did you like the most?

Please comment why did you like their presentation the most?

8. How were the coffee breaks during the conference?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10)

9. In terms of duration, the coffee breaks were:

Too short Just fine Too long

Other observations about the coffee breaks:

10. How were the oral sessions?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10) I did not participate in / listen to any oral sessions

Comment what you liked or disliked about oral sessions:

11. How were the poster sessions?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10) I did not participate in any poster sessions

Comment what you liked or disliked about poster sessions:

12. How was the special event discussion - 'Beyond the Visible: Linking Thoughts on Light'?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10) I did not participate in this event

14. How was the special plenary lecture of 'Open Readings 2025' - 'Biophotonics at the Faculty of Physics: From Laser Flash to Cancer Theranostic Nanotechnologies' by Prof. Ričardas Rotomskis?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10) I did not participate in this event

15. How was the Social Evening of 'Open Readings 2025'?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10) I did not participate in the Social Evening event

Comment what you liked or disliked about Social Evening of 'Open Readings 2025':

16. How was the registration process of 'Open Readings 2025'?

It was hard to register, I encountered problems The registration process was smooth I did not encounter any problems, but I think it could have been smoother

17. Was it hard to find helpful information on openreadings.eu website?

There wasn't enough information on the website and it was very hard to find There was enough information on the website and it was easy to find There was enough information on the website, but it was very hard to find

18. How would you rate the Open Readings mobile app?

Bad (1-5) Okay (5-8) Great (8-10) I did not download the app

Comment what you liked or disliked about the mobile app of 'Open Readings 2025':

19. Do you follow 'Open Readings' on our social platforms (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn)? Did you find enough relevant information there?

No, I do not follow Yes, I follow, but there is not enough information there Yes, I follow, there is enough useful content about the conference

Please comment how could we improve our social media content:

20. If you have any other concerns or suggestions, you can write them down here: