CRISPR-CAS PROTOSPACER INTERACTION WITH ADAPTATION COMPLEX

Viktoras Ragožius1, Inga Songailienė1, 2, Lina Malinauskaitė1

1 EMBL Partnership Institute, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Lithuania

2 Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Lithuania

[email protected]

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) and their associated genes (cas) provide an adaptive immunity against exogenous nucleic acids in bacteria and archaea [1]. During the adaptation a recognition of a short motif known as a PAM (protospacer-adjacent motif) initiates the binding of adaptation complex to a target DNA. Adaptation complex cleaves out a segment of the target DNA and generates a protospacer. After duplication of the repeat, protospacer is inserted into the leader end of the CRISPR array and becomes a spacer [2]. Therefore, the main purpose of this research was to investigate how the sequence of a protospacer affects the adaptation process.

In this study the adaptation complex was co-expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and purified using a two-step affinity chromatography. Afterwards, in vitro integration assay was carried out. In total 7 different protospacers were analysed. All sequences of protospacers contained an identical segment for the integration into CRISPR array. However, they differed from one another at their 5' and/or 3' ends.

Here we purified a functional adaptation complex and showed that the sequence of a protospacer has an impact for the interaction with adaptation complex. Protospacer that contained sticky ends and double-stranded PAM had the best integration efficiency, which indicates a stronger interaction with adaptation complex.

Taking everything into account, these results provide insight into the mechanism of adaptation complex and protospacer interaction affecting the process of adaptation.


[1] J.Y. Wang, P. Pausch, J.A. Doudna, Structural biology of CRISPR-Cas immunity and genome editing enzymes, Nature Reviews Microbiology 20, 641-656 (2022).

[2] K.S. Makarova, Y.I. Wolf, J. Iranzo et al., Evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants, Nature Reviews 18, 67-83 (2020).